G.I.R.M. Warfare by Dr. Thomas Droleskey is a book that points out the monstrosity of the novus ordo missal and the General Instruction Roman Missal. Basically it is not worth anything. I treat the novus ordo in its many failures as kleenex when you need to blow your nose. I have the same sentiments with the traditionalists regarding the Vatican II documents. In some cases there is ambiguous terminology but it was devised that way so it could be anything goes. Some portions of some documents seem okay but as a whole this council and its documents must be rejected since it is erroneous internally as well as externally and it is modernism, humanism, relativism and other things that the true church anathematizes. In Dei Verbum which uses Vatican I and the Council of Trent to make it look good I can tell you that this Divine Revelation of this document is a smokescreen for Vatican II. It has nothing to do with the Holy Spirit or being guided to restructure the Church. Lumen Gentium does not possess any light of Christ at all. We know Jesus is the light, not Vatican II. The evidence since the early 1960's is before us in the church and outside it. The darkness of the false church hides the light of Christ and the true church we belong to. I said if you do not join before you leave this world the one true Catholic Church you will probably perish. This is one that all the saints and good popes were in. It is pre-Vatican II.

I shall start on NOSTRA AETATE. This VATICAN II document was proclaimed Oct. 28, 1965. Ch. 1 - The church is not responsible for bringing unity with non-Christian religions or non-catholic faiths. The door to the Roman Catholic Church is open for conversion and embracing its true doctrinal teaching prior to Vatican II. The Church was built to worship and praise God. Not to embrace other religions. I argue not against this fraternal love for love itself, but the new catholic church attempts to force on you a false love, since you are not obligated to this temporal love. The love you must have strictly is the love of Christ for others in the church first and then you must have Christ like love for outsiders and they must seek conversion to the truth. You must not bend to or accept the religious customs of any other religion other than the Catholic Faith. The Church is not responsible for all nations in its attempts for unity. Fellowship with outsiders has proven to be disastrous. For if you are evangelizing to the Church why are you as a church seeking to accept false religions for fellowship? This is not serving Christ or His Church.

Paragraph 3 section 1 - the liberal writers of Vatican II assume other religions expect answers to unsolved riddles of the human condition. Perhaps if they stop praying to false gods, or believe in the truth in which Holy Mother Church teaches they will get some of the answers they seek. For the Living Word of God was given freely for those who sought the truth which is by Him alone. The Church rejects the false religions in its entirety. It cannot accept partial truths of a religion. If any of the other religions do have what appears to be holy or good on its face and under its surface then while the Church does not condemn but it cannot praise for such religion is still not in full truth in accord with Scripture and the Holy Church. It must reject this as well. The writers then cover themselves up and point out John 14:6 in paragraph two of section 2. Para. three of 2 - by dialogue and colloboration with other religions the Church must teach only the Catholic faith and none other. She the Church does not seek out what other religions have which is good. This also must be rejected for it is not pleasing to Christ since they do not embrace His teachings and His church. All dialogue must be rejected. I state again the doors to the church are open for those who want its only true religion in which they only shall be saved. The Church does not promote and preserve socio-cultural values among these outsiders. She only fosters to the promoting and preservation of Her Holy teachings without compromise to cultures that would weaken her holy truths.

Paragraph 3 - The Church does not esteem the Moslems, but rather She condemns them, for theirs is a false religion, a heretical extreme blasphemous set of beliefs in which Holy Mother Church anathematizes. Their god is not our God. The modern church teaches a heresy that seeks to unite the true catholic faith with the radical beliefs of the Moslem religion. Their founder was a false prophet. Unless they embrace the one faith of Holy origin through Christ the Saviour, they shall likewise perish. The modernist catholic church in its error seeks to promote social justice and moral welfare as well as peace and freedom. It cannot do these things with heretics, idolaters in unity for if the catholics embrace unity with these false religions they shall likewise be condemned in heretical associations and in scandals to the faithful. Paragraph 4 - The new covenant does not spiritually bond or tie us to Abraham's stock, for this stock consists of those of the Jewish faith. We are separated from this race as a religion since they have to this day openly rejected Christ and His only redemptive power and grace in which no one can get to the Father but by the Son. The Cross of Christ did not reconcile the gentiles and Jews, but is a stumbling block for the Jews who said it themselves long ago "let His blood be on us and on our generations" thereby condemning themselves of their own testimony for lack of belief and hardness of heart to the Sacrificial Lamb of God.

Paragraph 5 - Fraternal dialogues with any religion outside the Catholic Faith has only brought scandal, schism, confusion and permits other religions to hold on to their false beliefs that they can be saved by their religions and not Christ and the scriptural, doctrinal teachings of the Church. Paragraph 6 - The Jews of today are accursed as long as they reject Christ and His Church. The modern catechism of post council false authority extending to the heretical authority of John Paul II is hereby condemned by Holy Mother Church in all its ecumenical practices, beliefs and its manifest heresies. This attempt to say this is the Gospel of Christ or His spirit calls Him a liar.

DECREE ON THE APOSTOLATE OF THE LAITY
Number 7 paragraph 5 - The deception of calling itself a sacred synod was to impose on the laity a belief this was a doctrinal council and not pastoral. Nonetheless the modernist view is apparent by saying the temporal order must be adapted and renewed to shifting circumstances of time, place and peoples. As if God and the Holy Church change and are to adapt. Contrary for it is the world and the members of the church that must adapt. I take the actual documents from the Vatican website. I cite the problem "and adapted to the shifting circumstances of time, place, and peoples". This is the temporal order being renewed to these adaptations and that includes all cultures. It is saying to Jesus Christ and His bride you have to adapt to cultures, the times, places and peoples. I say no to this and so does Heaven. It is not doctrine but part of the left minded ecumenism that has destroyed the internal structures of the church.

GRAVISSIMUM EDUCATIONIS proclaimed October 28, 1965.
Introduction, fifth paragraph - the post conciliar commission will apply by episcopal conferences on varying local situations. This is not in conformity with the education as was set by the church prior to modernism. It updates a catechismal destructiveness and opens up a revised sex education for schools. It adheres to the beginning of sexual activity among the free thinking societies being formed in revolutionaries.

PERFECTAE CARITATIS

2. The adaptation and renewal of religious life is inclined to adapt with their institutes to changed conditions of the modern times. This adaptation of religious life is a departure of the traditions and reverence of the Church's history and its internal structures. She does not adapt to the times in her institutes or conditions. She is a constant and she never changes. It is another grave fault of this dirty council that presumes the Holy Spirit is at work and inspires changes. Those presumptuous advances are defined to remove the fortifications of the Holy Church to break her down by use of false interpretations of biblical, pastoral, liturgical, dogmatic, ecumenical and social restructuring as specified in para. c. Paragraph e, a priority over the active ministry meaning the priesthood is the adjustments this false council made for the needs of the age or latter times. This so called renewal of spirit is merely an illusion just as this council and its new age church and its 1969 missae are. The priesthood then not only becomes less significant but must adapt to the "newness" of the times and cultural demands.

Paragraph 3 - The demands of cultural, social and economic circumstances requires a suitably adapted manner of living and praying, working for the missions. It says that these missions must adapt to these demands. This overall adaptation of the diabolical council is to make people their own gods or in charge of their own destiny by suppressing holiness and the doctrinal truths. It slaps Christ in the face. The other paragraph demands the previous constitutions, books, prayers, ceremonies to be re-edited that is revised to modernism and suppressed. The unsacred synod then says obsolete laws not only be suppressed but new decrees be established.

Paragraph 4 - The renewal and adaptation decrees demand cooperation of all members of the institute (Church). It is a new church and a revised theology. It imposes so the deceitful council is not pastoral but establishes itself as a doctrinal council.

Section 9 second para. - Those in convent and monastic life are to adapt to the new reform (apostolate) in which the former holiness and sacrifices are suppressed and such demands are to update vocational practices. In paragraph 10 the holiness of vocations is destroyed by the demands of adjusting their way of life to MODERN needs. Section 11 - Secular institutes are specified to remain in that frame, that is secular in thought and not to grow in religious and holy frames of mind in order to carry out free thinking and secular apostolates within the structures of the Church that the shakers, quakers and demanding to suppress and rebuild a new religious updated structure to conform to the secular frame. This apostolate is to expand in all structures of the exterior and interior of the church.
Section 14 Paragraph 4 - Subjects such as those in vocations are to be enforced to cooperate with active and responsible obedience in undertaking NEW tasks and those already undertaken. It means that those in vocations are commanded to blindly obey even if such authority is not licit or not of sound teaching or faithful to Christ and His true Church. This will impose false teaching of vocations and to pass that false teaching to those in schools and in catechismal learning. It also imposes modern songs and new praise.

Section 18 in paragraph 3 implies these in religious life adapt to the currents and attitudes of sentiment and thought prevalent in social life of the new age. Religious life must be integrated to fit the demands of this social new age and the education must be blended in harmoniously with this new social adaptation the new church requires.
Section 20 paragraph 2 - The missionary spirit is required to adapt to each community and to modern conditions and a new gospel must be preached though the progressivist modernist writers imply that the Gospel is being preached. Its agenda was to modernize the Gospel and adapt the true Gospel to every nation to meet the needs of the nations but to waterdown the Gospel or to change the Gospel and church Biblical teaching so that it would adapt to these cultures and times.

DEI VERBUM (The Smokescreen of Vatican II)

Number 8 Paragraph 3, "The words of the holy fathers witness to the presence of this living tradition, whose wealth is poured into the practice and life of the believing and praying Church. Through the same tradition the Church's full canon of the sacred books is known, and the sacred writings themselves are more profoundly understood and unceasingly made active in her." This is modernism and liberalism combined to confuse the faithful that tradition progresses. It does not progress. It is once and for all defined by the Apostolic Age and the builders of the early church to better fully explain holy mother church's doctrine, dogma that is never changing. Tradition is not in men but in Christ and His first disciples. Don't be confused if the 202 heresies of Vatican II don't point out word by word what is set forth. You must look at the actual documents of Vatican II to understand how cleverly these hidden and ambiguous terms were used to promote heresy, modernism and progress of the world and man. Human experience does not dictate what tradition is. This is heretical and apostate.

Number 22 of Dei Verbum has been interpreted as new bibles must be made with the help of Protestants. It means that the catholic faith is not responsible for providing the truth and the Latin Vulgate to protestants, nor may the catholic read these bibles including the King James Version. The church has never been able to take upon the authority to retranslate the Scriptures other than what has been taken down by tradition and the Vulgate from the original texts of the Bible. It can not be made suitable for modern man or other religions ever. The church admonishes those who translate and ask assistance from non-catholics regarding the Sacred Texts. The punishment is eternal damnation as John writes in Revelation with adding, editing, revising or reinterpreting the Scriptures.
"Easy access to Sacred Scripture should be provided for all the Christian faithful. That is why the Church from the very beginning accepted as her own that very ancient Greek translation; of the Old Testament which is called the septuagint; and she has always given a place of honor to other Eastern translations and Latin ones especially the Latin translation known as the vulgate. But since the word of God should be accessible at all times, the Church by her authority and with maternal concern sees to it that suitable and correct translations are made into different languages, especially from the original texts of the sacred books. And should the opportunity arise and the Church authorities approve, if these translations are produced in cooperation with the separated brethren as well, all Christians will be able to use them."